From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 18:28:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49556896.8070307@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <006201c967af$24c29740$6602a8c0@bui.materna.com>
Roland wrote:
>> On Friday 2008-12-26 21:23, Roland wrote:
>>
>>> what about some "make modules_install_compressed" instead ?
>>>
>>> as i have run out of diskspace quite often when installing test
>>> kernels, i
>>> think we really need a feature like this.
>>>
>>> i`d also favour the makefile approach.
>>> why another kconfig option?
>>>
>>> jan`s patch looks clean and simple, but i think it`s a little bit
>>> intrusive...
>>
>> Why so? module-ini
>
> with "intrusive" i meant, that all modules are now compressed by default
> and there is no switch to build them uncompressed.
> so you change a long established default which may not be welcomed by
> everyone and give no option for conservative people.
>
How many people use the option to install an uncompressed kernel?
> we should take care and not break things.
> default uncompressed, compressed implented as an option is a better
> strategy, imho.
> discuss changing the default at a later time then.
>
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-26 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-26 20:23 [PATCH] Compress kernel modules on installation Roland
2008-12-26 21:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-12-26 23:10 ` Roland
2008-12-26 23:28 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2008-12-26 22:02 ` david
2008-12-26 21:15 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-12-26 22:28 ` david
2008-12-26 23:23 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-12-27 0:58 ` david
2009-01-01 8:27 ` Willy Tarreau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-26 23:49 Roland
2008-02-25 21:42 Steve Brokenshire
2008-02-25 22:17 ` Oleg Verych
2008-02-25 22:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-25 22:32 ` Oleg Verych
2008-02-25 23:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-25 22:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-26 9:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-26 10:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-26 12:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-26 13:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-26 11:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-04-01 19:42 ` Steve Brokenshire
2008-12-26 19:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-12-26 19:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-26 19:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-12-26 22:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-26 23:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-18 21:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-18 21:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-18 21:15 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-01-18 21:18 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-18 21:25 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-01-19 20:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-20 3:30 ` Steve Brokenshire
2009-01-25 16:51 ` Steve Brokenshire
2009-01-25 18:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-26 21:39 ` Steve Brokenshire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49556896.8070307@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox