From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756502AbYLaLzZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:55:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755450AbYLaLzN (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:55:13 -0500 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:40245 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755172AbYLaLzM (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:55:12 -0500 Message-ID: <495B5D9D.8020803@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:55:09 -0800 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: Li Zefan , Ingo Molnar , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] cpumask: fix compile error in kernel/irq/proc.c References: <495B345A.5080302@cn.fujitsu.com> <200812312136.40502.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200812312136.40502.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wednesday 31 December 2008 19:29:06 Li Zefan wrote: >> diff --git a/kernel/irq/proc.c b/kernel/irq/proc.c >> index 2abd3a7..5a5ac60 100644 >> --- a/kernel/irq/proc.c >> +++ b/kernel/irq/proc.c >> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static ssize_t default_affinity_write(struct file *file, >> if (err) >> goto out; >> >> - if (!is_affinity_mask_valid(new_value)) { >> + if (!is_affinity_mask_valid(*new_value)) { >> err = -EINVAL; >> goto out; >> } > > This looks like one for Mike: I have *new_value in the cpumask tree. > > Mike? > > Thanks, > Rusty. I have the old value, but then I don't have any affinity changes in my tree. Aren't those all in your cpumask tree? Thanks, Mike