From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libusb broken on 2.6.28 x86_64 ?
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 03:15:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495DCD18.8060900@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090102075835.GA3955@suse.de>
Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 02:51:13AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 02:01:21AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>>>> Mark Lord wrote:
>> ..
>>>> Mmm.. broken only for 64-bit userspace, it seems.
>>>>
>>>> I've recompiled the same app against 32-bit libs,
>>>> and it works just fine on that 64-bit system,
>>>> as well as on 32-bit systems.
>>>>
>>>> But not when compiled for pure 64-bit operation on a 64-bit system.
>> ..
>>> Which version of libusb, a new one was just released a few weeks ago
>>> that fixes a lot of problems reported in the older libusb versions, and
>>> made things much faster to boot. You might want to check it out.
>> ..
>>
>> This is with libusb-0.1-4, which has been working fine with all prior
>> kernels,
>> including the 2.6.27.xx series.
>>
>> Userspace stuff like this is not supposed to be broken from kernel to
>> kernel.
>
> No it shouldn't, I was thinking this was the first time you had tried
> such a thing (64bit userspace apps.)
>
> If using 2.6.27 works, then we need to fix this.
..
Yup. I don't really see anything likely in kernel from 2.6.27 to 2.6.28,
other than perhaps the new "poisoning" code. I wonder if that could be it?
Kinda weird that the device works with libusb the first time it is used,
but then fails on all subsequent runs of the same app, until replugged.
But.. I can run the 32-bit compat app after a 64-bit failure,
and *that* does work. There's gotta be a useful clue in there somewhere.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-02 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-02 6:31 libusb broken on 2.6.28 x86_64 ? Mark Lord
2009-01-02 7:01 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-02 7:24 ` Greg KH
2009-01-02 7:48 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-02 7:51 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-02 7:58 ` Greg KH
2009-01-02 8:15 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2009-01-02 8:25 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-02 8:28 ` Greg KH
2009-01-02 9:37 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-02 13:23 ` Alan Stern
2009-01-02 15:44 ` Mark Lord
[not found] <20090102082824.GA4212@suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2009-01-02 11:43 ` Marcus Meissner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495DCD18.8060900@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox