Re: swiotlb: remove duplicated #include

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
>   
>>> In a few days, but wanted to hear back from either Jeremy or Becky 
>>> first about how well they actually work in their usecases.
>>>       
>> Well, you don't need to wait, I think.
>>
>> All Jeremy and Becky need is adding highmem support to swiotlb. How we 
>> support it doesn't matter. We can choose better one.
>>
>> We all (including Jeremy) agreed that Becky's physical address scheme is 
>> better (simpler) than Jeremy's struct page and offset scheme. Surely, 
>> Becky's scheme works for Xen and him (Jeremy said that he tested it 
>> lightly).
>>     
>
> Jeremy said, when he submitted this series, shortly before Christmas:
>
>  >> Here's a work in progress series [...]
>  >>
>  >> Quick testing showed no problems, but I haven't had the chance to do 
>  >> anything extensive.
>
> Jeremy, did you have a chance to do more testing with the current 
> tip/master bits on Xen, so that we can push it to Linus?
>   

I'm going to be on vacation until the 12th, so I won't have a chance to 
do anything until then (perhaps Ian will have a chance to poke at them 
before then).  I'm expecting Becky's patches to work as-is, or if not, 
be easily fixed with a couple of small bugfix patches.  So I say go 
ahead if they work for everyone else.

    J