From: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, corbet@lwn.net
Subject: Who wrote 2.6.28
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:18:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496224D7.2030109@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1611 bytes --]
As Jonathon and Greg did, I also made a statistic about who wrote the Linux kernel.
The following data is for 2.6.28 development. (http://www.remword.com/kps_result/)
1. The attachment graph "commit.png" shows the change of commit amount of patches and changed lines.
It seems that 2.6.28 has less commits than 2.6.27 of both patch set and changed lines.
2. The attachment graph "who.png" shows the involved developers and employers in each version of kernel.
It seems that 2.6.28 has more developers and companies involved than previous two versions, but
less than that of 2.6.25. From a long vision, more and more developers and companies join to the
development of Linux kernel, but the increase speed is not so fast.
3. About TOP30 employers who commit most to kernel, (http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_28_emtop)
Hobbyists is still the most group who contribute most to kernel development.
4. About longtail, (http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_28_lt)
There are 624 people who committed less than 2 patch sets, but their contribution is about 8%
of total.
5. About Reviewed-by and Tested-by.
More and more review and test efforts are regarded by people, Tested-by sign number(173)
is highest in kernel development history.
6. Anyone who wants to check some person or company's contribution curve, please use
http://remword.com/kps_result/evolvement.php
BTW:
To collect information about developers' employ relationship, I search on the Internet
(not by asking themselves) and use gitdm-config which is created by Jonathon and Greg.
Thanks Jonathon and Greg :)
--
WCN
[-- Attachment #2: who.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 5533 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: commit.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 7005 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 15:18 Wang Chen [this message]
2009-01-08 17:53 ` Who wrote 2.6.28 Kristoffer Ericson
2009-01-09 9:07 ` Wang Chen
2009-02-02 18:16 ` Kristoffer Ericson
2009-01-09 14:09 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-09 22:11 ` David Miller
2009-01-10 21:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-10 22:00 ` Greg KH
2009-01-12 2:03 ` Wang Chen
2009-01-12 4:09 ` Greg KH
2009-01-12 5:04 ` Wang Chen
2009-01-12 15:54 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-01-13 6:16 ` Wang Chen
2009-01-14 20:25 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-01-12 17:49 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-12 17:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-01-13 8:12 ` Wang Chen
2009-01-11 18:30 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-12 2:12 ` Wang Chen
2009-01-12 1:51 ` Wang Chen
2009-01-12 15:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-13 8:14 ` Wang Chen
2009-01-12 1:49 ` Wang Chen
2009-01-13 16:57 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496224D7.2030109@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox