Re: [RESEND][RFC PATCH v2] waitfd

Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10T21:20:38Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 522 bytes --]

On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 16:14 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:

> From the perspective of waitfd, the only difference between WNOHANG and
> O_NONBLOCK is which argument you put the flags in. The API should only
> support one or the other, but internally they would imply the same thing.
>
Well, you get O_NONBLOCK for free by having a file descriptor; and you
can't turn off people trying to turn it on/off with fcntl() - so you may
as well just use that, no? :-)

Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott@canonical.com

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]