Re: [PULL] cpumask tree

Rusty Russell
2009-01-03T07:21:18Z

On Saturday 03 January 2009 07:08:40 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - architectures that have no __fls (8 out of 21) fail to build:
>
> arch/cris
> arch/frv
> arch/h8300
> arch/m32r
> arch/m68k
> arch/mn10300
> arch/xtensa

Fixes pushed, m68k should be OK tho; is this actual compile test? You have
to look in include/asm-m68k to see __fls.

> Rusty, would it be fine with you if we did all the remaining bits via
> tip/cpus4096? It's your tree and your bits and we wanted to send our
> remaining bits after your tree went to Linus but the conflict resolutions
> from Mike are valuable so i think we should reconsider the ordering.

Yeah, no reason for us to do the merge twice. As long as it ends upstream,
I'm a happy camper.

Thanks,
Rusty.