Re: [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3

Linus Torvalds
2009-01-03T20:29:08Z

On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> ok. The pending regressions are all fixed now, and i've just finished my
> standard tests on the latest tree and all the tests passed fine.

Ok, pulled and pushed out.

Has anybody looked at what the stack size is with MAXSMP set with an
allyesconfig? And what areas are still problematic, if any? Are we going
to have some code-paths that still essentially have 1kB+ of stack space
just because they haven't been converted and still have the cpu mask on
stack?

Linus