From: "Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@intel.com>
To: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>
Cc: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com>,
"'Grant Grundler'" <grundler@parisc-linux.org>,
"'linux-pci@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Jesse Barnes'" <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"'iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org'"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"'Arjan van de Ven'" <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:16:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49677856.90807@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090109070805.525c0de9@infradead.org>
Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:53:14 +0800
> "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:05:15 -0800
>>> Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:58:46 +0800 "Han, Weidong"
>>>>
>>>> I updated to Linus' latest git (as your description made me wonder
>>>> if the async stuff might play a role here). I still get an oops -
>>>> but at a different spot and the system no longer hangs - it partly
>>>> recovers (but things aren't too well - for example my USB
>>>> keyboard / mouse don't work anymore).
>>> Spoke too soon. Rebooted and had the same hard lockup again. This
>>> time I had my camera within reach, so here's the trace:
>>>
>>> device_to_iommu+0x33/0x73
>>> domain_context_mapping_one+0x37/0x335
>>> domain_context_mapping+0x25/0xa7
>>> iommu_prepare_identity+0xd7/0xf3
>>> intel_iommu_init+0x4e4/0x8f3
>>> ? mutex_lock
>>> ? sysctl_net_init
>>> ? pci_iommu_init
>>> pci_iommu_init
>>>
>>> I also have stack, code and register values. Let me know if you need
>>> them. Or I can just post the picture :-)
>>>
>>> Again, very latest git tree, VT-d enabled.
>>>
>>> /D
>> I tried latest git tree, it works for me. Above call trace looks
>> right.
>
> Spent some more time reading the code. Can't quite claim to understand
> all of it, yet, but I notice that most everywhere else drhd->devices[i]
> is checked to be != NULL before it is accessed. Why is it safe not to
> do that in device_to_iommu()?
>
> Would the patch below be a valid fix? It stops my system from hanging at
> boot. But I wonder if there is an assertion that if drhd->ignored is 0
> then drhd->devices[0..drhd->device_cnt] is known to be != NULL and
> therefore this test is just hiding a bug somewhere else...
>
> /D
>
> Signed-off-by: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> index 235fb7a..3dfecb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -438,7 +438,8 @@ static struct intel_iommu *device_to_iommu(u8 bus,
> u8 devfn) continue;
>
> for (i = 0; i < drhd->devices_cnt; i++)
> - if (drhd->devices[i]->bus->number == bus &&
> + if (drhd->devices[i] &&
> + drhd->devices[i]->bus->number == bus &&
> drhd->devices[i]->devfn == devfn)
> return drhd->iommu;
>
Did you see following in the kernel message?
printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
"Device scope device [%04x:%02x:%02x.%02x] not found\n",
segment, scope->bus, path->dev, path->fn);
If yes, then
Acked-by: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-09 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-08 20:05 git-latest: kernel oops in IOMMU setup Dirk Hohndel
2009-01-08 21:41 ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-08 21:56 ` Dirk Hohndel
2009-01-09 0:58 ` Han, Weidong
2009-01-09 2:05 ` Dirk Hohndel
2009-01-09 4:52 ` Dirk Hohndel
2009-01-09 6:53 ` Han, Weidong
2009-01-09 15:08 ` Dirk Hohndel
2009-01-09 16:16 ` Zhao, Yu [this message]
2009-01-09 16:34 ` Dirk Hohndel
2009-01-09 16:45 ` Zhao, Yu
2009-01-09 16:55 ` Dirk Hohndel
2009-01-09 16:58 ` [PATCH] Prevent oops at boot with VT-d Dirk Hohndel
2009-01-11 15:25 ` [Resend][PATCH] " Dirk Hohndel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49677856.90807@intel.com \
--to=yu.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=hohndel@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=weidong.han@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox