From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: partly revert "sched debug: remove NULL checking in print_cfs_rt_rq()"
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:43:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49685193.6010302@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
Impact: avoid accessing NULL tg.css->cgroup
In commit 0a0db8f5c9d4bbb9bbfcc2b6cb6bce2d0ef4d73d, I removed checking
NULL tg.css->cgroup, but I realized I was wrong when I found reading
/proc/sched_debug can race with cgroup_create().
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/sched_debug.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_debug.c b/kernel/sched_debug.c
index 4293cfa..16eeba4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_debug.c
@@ -145,6 +145,19 @@ static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, int rq_cpu)
read_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) && \
+ (defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) || defined(CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED))
+static void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *buf, int buflen)
+{
+ /* may be NULL if the underlying cgroup isn't fully-created yet */
+ if (!tg->css.cgroup) {
+ buf[0] = '\0';
+ return;
+ }
+ cgroup_path(tg->css.cgroup, buf, buflen);
+}
+#endif
+
void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
s64 MIN_vruntime = -1, min_vruntime, max_vruntime = -1,
@@ -154,10 +167,10 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
unsigned long flags;
#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED)
- char path[128] = "";
+ char path[128];
struct task_group *tg = cfs_rq->tg;
- cgroup_path(tg->css.cgroup, path, sizeof(path));
+ task_group_path(tg, path, sizeof(path));
SEQ_printf(m, "\ncfs_rq[%d]:%s\n", cpu, path);
#elif defined(CONFIG_USER_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED)
@@ -208,10 +221,10 @@ void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) && defined(CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED)
- char path[128] = "";
+ char path[128];
struct task_group *tg = rt_rq->tg;
- cgroup_path(tg->css.cgroup, path, sizeof(path));
+ task_group_path(tg, path, sizeof(path));
SEQ_printf(m, "\nrt_rq[%d]:%s\n", cpu, path);
#else
--
1.5.4.rc3
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-10 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-10 7:43 Li Zefan [this message]
2009-01-11 1:40 ` [PATCH] sched: partly revert "sched debug: remove NULL checking in print_cfs_rt_rq()" Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49685193.6010302@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox