Re: [RESEND][RFC PATCH v2] waitfd

Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10T14:52:30Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 446 bytes --]

On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 22:39 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> Btw. It is not that I am trying to argue against sys_waitfd(), but do
> you have the "real life" example when it can be useful? Yes, poll().
> But we have signalfd. SIGCHLD is not rt signal, but afaics this is not
> the problem actually. Just curious.
>
signalfd() can't currently be made to work in the way you describe.

Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott@canonical.com

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]