From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753904AbZAKW33 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:29:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751517AbZAKW3U (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:29:20 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.179.29]:43119 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751290AbZAKW3U (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:29:20 -0500 Message-ID: <496A72B3.8010105@sgi.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:29:07 -0800 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: cpumask change causes sparc build bustage References: <20090111205008.db0a410e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090111.040640.188129980.davem@davemloft.net> <496A232A.5070801@sgi.com> <20090111.135029.199678338.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20090111.135029.199678338.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Mike Travis > Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:49:46 -0800 > >> Thanks for fixing it. In actuality though, it should return cpu_mask_all >> instead of CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR but that's a small nit. > > CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR is defined to &cpu_mask_all, that's why I used it, to > be consistent with the other macro using CPU_MASK_ALL right above it. It's not a big deal. CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR is one of those "bandaids" to keep current code working until it's all been cleansed of the old cpumask_t functions. Rusty's so-called "big hammer" patch. Thanks, Mike