From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762696AbZALWte (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:49:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754669AbZALWbT (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:31:19 -0500 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:47463 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758586AbZALWbR (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:31:17 -0500 Message-ID: <496BC4B1.1080002@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:31:13 -0800 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Ingo Molnar , Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] irq: update all archs to use new irq_desc cpumask_var_t's. References: <20090112220519.566749000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <20090112222123.GB15294@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090112222123.GB15294@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Travis wrote: > >> Ingo - should I push these to tip/cpus4096 via the cpus4096-for-ingo >> tree since that has the relevant changes to irq_desc? Or by some other >> means? > > yes, please update cpus4096-for-ingo so that i can pull it from your tree. > > Ingo Ok, I will do that right now. And then you'll pull and do these other things: > this should all be a single patch, because the cpus4096 tree does not > build on these arhitectures right now. > in fact, i think i'll rebase the whole lineup (so no need to resend - i'll > squash these fixes together), because this is how it looks like right now: ??? Thanks, Mike