* [PATCH] ring_buffer: reset write when reserve buffer fail
@ 2009-01-12 3:06 Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-14 3:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-14 18:19 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2009-01-12 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Impact: reset struct buffer_page.write when interrupt storm
if struct buffer_page.write is not reset, any succedent committing
will corrupted ring_buffer:
static inline void
rb_set_commit_to_write(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
{
......
cpu_buffer->commit_page->commit =
cpu_buffer->commit_page->write;
......
}
when "if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, next_page == reader_page))", ring_buffer
is disabled, but some reserved buffers may haven't been committed.
we need reset struct buffer_page.write.
when "if (unlikely(next_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page))", ring_buffer
is still available, we should not corrupt it.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 8b0daf0..18bfd76 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1025,12 +1025,8 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
}
if (next_page == head_page) {
- if (!(buffer->flags & RB_FL_OVERWRITE)) {
- /* reset write */
- if (tail <= BUF_PAGE_SIZE)
- local_set(&tail_page->write, tail);
+ if (!(buffer->flags & RB_FL_OVERWRITE))
goto out_unlock;
- }
/* tail_page has not moved yet? */
if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
@@ -1105,6 +1101,10 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
return event;
out_unlock:
+ /* reset write */
+ if (tail <= BUF_PAGE_SIZE)
+ local_set(&tail_page->write, tail);
+
__raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
local_irq_restore(flags);
return NULL;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: reset write when reserve buffer fail
2009-01-12 3:06 [PATCH] ring_buffer: reset write when reserve buffer fail Lai Jiangshan
@ 2009-01-14 3:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-14 18:19 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2009-01-14 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi, Steven Rostedt,
Have you seen these two patches?
(other patch is "[PATCH -tip] ftrace: fix trace_output")
Thanks, Lai
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Impact: reset struct buffer_page.write when interrupt storm
>
> if struct buffer_page.write is not reset, any succedent committing
> will corrupted ring_buffer:
>
> static inline void
> rb_set_commit_to_write(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> {
> ......
> cpu_buffer->commit_page->commit =
> cpu_buffer->commit_page->write;
> ......
> }
>
>
> when "if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, next_page == reader_page))", ring_buffer
> is disabled, but some reserved buffers may haven't been committed.
> we need reset struct buffer_page.write.
>
> when "if (unlikely(next_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page))", ring_buffer
> is still available, we should not corrupt it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 8b0daf0..18bfd76 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -1025,12 +1025,8 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
> }
>
> if (next_page == head_page) {
> - if (!(buffer->flags & RB_FL_OVERWRITE)) {
> - /* reset write */
> - if (tail <= BUF_PAGE_SIZE)
> - local_set(&tail_page->write, tail);
> + if (!(buffer->flags & RB_FL_OVERWRITE))
> goto out_unlock;
> - }
>
> /* tail_page has not moved yet? */
> if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
> @@ -1105,6 +1101,10 @@ __rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
> return event;
>
> out_unlock:
> + /* reset write */
> + if (tail <= BUF_PAGE_SIZE)
> + local_set(&tail_page->write, tail);
> +
> __raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> return NULL;
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ring_buffer: reset write when reserve buffer fail
2009-01-12 3:06 [PATCH] ring_buffer: reset write when reserve buffer fail Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-14 3:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
@ 2009-01-14 18:19 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2009-01-14 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lai Jiangshan; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi Lai,
Sorry for the late response, I've got a million things going on at once,
and this needed more thought than a quick review.
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> Impact: reset struct buffer_page.write when interrupt storm
>
> if struct buffer_page.write is not reset, any succedent committing
> will corrupted ring_buffer:
>
> static inline void
> rb_set_commit_to_write(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer)
> {
> ......
> cpu_buffer->commit_page->commit =
> cpu_buffer->commit_page->write;
> ......
> }
>
>
> when "if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, next_page == reader_page))", ring_buffer
> is disabled, but some reserved buffers may haven't been committed.
> we need reset struct buffer_page.write.
So what you are saying is, when we hit this anomaly, another cpu might be
writing to the ring buffer, and will soon do a commit.
>
> when "if (unlikely(next_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page))", ring_buffer
> is still available, we should not corrupt it.
OK, makes sense. I'll queue it up.
Thanks!
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-14 18:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-12 3:06 [PATCH] ring_buffer: reset write when reserve buffer fail Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-14 3:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-14 18:19 ` Steven Rostedt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox