From: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:38:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496D5E19.7040802@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090113184536.95ebc973.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:42:39 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:10:39 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> From: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:40:04 -0500
>>>
>>>
>>>> Todays git produces this compile error on sparc32:
>>>>
>>>> kernel/up.c:10: error: redefinition of ___smp_call_function_single___
>>>> /usr/src/sparc32/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h:78: error: previous definition of ___smp_call_function_single___ was here
>>>>
>>> Andrew, are you sure that Makefile condition for compiling
>>> up.o is correct?
>>>
>> you give me grounds for now being ;)
>>
>>
>>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
>>> obj-y += smp.o
>>> else
>>> obj-y += up.o
>>> endif
>>>
>>> If an arch doesn't use generic SMP helpers, there is no way
>>> we should compile up.c into the tree when SMP.
>>>
>>>
>> How's about this?
>>
>> --- a/kernel/Makefile~a
>> +++ a/kernel/Makefile
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
>> obj-y += smp.o
>> else
>> -obj-y += up.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += up.o
>> endif
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
>>
>
> err, the other way of course...
>
> --- a/kernel/Makefile~a
> +++ a/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
> obj-y += smp.o
> else
> +ifneq ($(CONFIG_SMP),y)
> obj-y += up.o
> endif
> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
> _
>
>
>
>
This worked:
diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
index 2aebc4c..368227d 100644
--- a/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/Makefile
@@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
obj-y += smp.o
else
+ifneq ($(CONFIG_SMP),y)
obj-y += up.o
endif
+endif
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) += spinlock.o
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <496D4274.6000304@earthlink.net>
2009-01-14 2:10 ` sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’ David Miller
2009-01-14 2:42 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 2:45 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 3:38 ` Robert Reif [this message]
2009-01-14 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 15:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-14 18:25 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 20:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496D5E19.7040802@earthlink.net \
--to=reif@earthlink.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox