From: richard kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk>
To: Kyle McMartin <kyle@infradead.org>
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: kzalloc mod->ref
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:15:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496DBB25.9040101@rsk.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090114033533.GL25103@bombadil.infradead.org>
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
>
> Dynamically allocate mod->ref instead of fixing it in the struct module.
> Reduces on disk space wasted in the module .ko, and kills a loop
> initializing the local_t it contains since we can just kzalloc it.
>
> This matters when we're talking about large NR_CPUS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
> ---
> The patch removing cacheline_aligned from struct module_ref should be
> applied as well to cut down on the amount of memory we allocate. This
> patch makes a nice stopgap until we have per_cpu module references.
>
> cheers, Kyle
>
Hi Kyle,
As module_get/ put use module_ref as a per_cpu variable won't removing
the cacheline_aligned be a performance hit due to cacheline sharing on
machines with reasonable or small number of cpus?
(some of the network code seems to call module_get/put a lot!)
regards
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-14 3:35 [PATCH] module: kzalloc mod->ref Kyle McMartin
2009-01-14 5:54 ` [PATCHv2] " Kyle McMartin
2009-01-14 9:09 ` [PATCH] " Takashi Iwai
2009-01-14 15:58 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-14 16:25 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-01-14 19:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-14 20:37 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-01-14 20:53 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-14 17:51 ` richard kennedy
2009-01-14 18:17 ` Kyle McMartin
[not found] ` <200901151303.20006.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-01-25 15:52 ` Richard Kennedy
[not found] ` <200901151521.47326.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-01-15 6:03 ` Kyle McMartin
[not found] ` <200901261751.21817.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-01-27 1:36 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-27 1:58 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-27 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-28 12:24 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-14 10:15 ` richard kennedy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496DBB25.9040101@rsk.demon.co.uk \
--to=richard@rsk.demon.co.uk \
--cc=kyle@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox