public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "eliminate warn_on_slowpath()" change causes many gcc-3.2.3 warnings
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:40:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49726C56.6080905@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901181032350.3006@localhost.localdomain>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Don't do this. That just forces a load off a complex pointer instead, with 
> no upsides. At least if it was
> 
> 	extern const char warn_slowpath_nofmt[];
> 
> it would only load the pointer itself, which is still a fairly  expensive 
> op, but at least doesn't require the extra memory load.
> 
> But you'd be better off jusst making it something like
> 
> 	#define NO_FMT ((const char *)(-1))
> 
> instead, which is really much more obvious, and doesn't need any of that 
> "get a pointer" overhead.
> 

At least on x86, the two ops should be the same cost?

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-17 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-17 15:19 "eliminate warn_on_slowpath()" change causes many gcc-3.2.3 warnings Mikael Pettersson
2009-01-17 16:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-17 20:01   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-17 20:44     ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-17 20:57       ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-17 21:07       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-17 21:38         ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-17 23:37       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-17 23:40         ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-01-18  0:01           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-18  0:10             ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49726C56.6080905@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kyle@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox