From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL -tip v3] fix 39 'make headers_check' warnings
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:53:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497469AC.2030107@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090119110153.GA8321@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> They are. This bits advertise to userspace what features kvm supports,
>> both compile- and run-time.
>>
>
> This is wrong...
> The headers does not change with the kernel configuration and advertising the
> kvm features via a .h file like this is simply plain broken.
>
Ok. Don't know why I thought unifdef was supplied with the full
configuration.
> You cannot assume that the header files are generated with the exact same config
> as used by the running kernel.
>
This is just for arch specific defines. I'll move these to asm/kvm.h.
> And userspace has in no way access to the CONFIG_ namespace which is purely kernel-internal.
>
> I cannot see how you have ever seen kcm advertise that for example KVM_CAP_USER_NMI
> equals to 22 because CONFIG_X86 is never (supposed to be) defined in userspace -
> except if you did so yourself by some means.
>
We did, we ship a hacked-up kvm.h (generated by unifdef) with our userspace.
Thanks for the clarifications, helpful as always.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-19 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-18 14:04 [GIT PULL -tip v3] fix 39 'make headers_check' warnings Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-18 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-18 18:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-18 18:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-18 19:08 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-18 19:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-18 19:45 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-19 2:16 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-19 5:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-19 2:10 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-19 2:20 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-19 11:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 18:08 ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-18 18:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 9:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-19 11:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-19 11:53 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-01-24 6:16 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-04 14:28 ` Avi Kivity
2009-02-04 15:17 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-04 15:40 ` Avi Kivity
2009-02-04 16:00 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-04 16:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-02-04 17:22 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497469AC.2030107@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox