From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756046AbZASO31 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:29:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752895AbZASO2v (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:28:51 -0500 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:53390 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752763AbZASO2u (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:28:50 -0500 Message-ID: <49748E43.4030009@ru.mvista.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:29:23 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: MontaVista Software Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en-gb MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ide: move SFF I/O code to ide-io-sff.c References: <20090119130309.24745.40877.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090119130322.24745.76137.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <49748B95.9080105@ru.mvista.com> <200901191523.15240.bzolnier@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200901191523.15240.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>>Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >> Gah, what in the world is that SFF I/O code? >>>Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io-sff.c >>>=================================================================== >>>--- /dev/null >>>+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io-sff.c >>>@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@ >>>+ >>>+#include >>>+#include >>>+ >>>+/* >>>+ * Conventional PIO operations for ATA devices >>>+ */ >>>+ >>>+static u8 ide_inb(unsigned long port) >>>+{ >>>+ return (u8) inb(port); >>>+} >>>+ >>>+static void ide_outb(u8 val, unsigned long port) >>>+{ >>>+ outb(val, port); >>>+} >>>+ >>>+/* >>>+ * MMIO operations, typically used for SATA controllers >>>+ */ >>>+ >>>+static u8 ide_mm_inb(unsigned long port) >>>+{ >>>+ return (u8) readb((void __iomem *) port); >>>+} >>>+ >>>+static void ide_mm_outb(u8 value, unsigned long port) >>>+{ >>>+ writeb(value, (void __iomem *) port); >>>+} >> Ah, I see. Can we finally stop abusing the SFF name? Or are we bound to >>copy every mistake that libata has made? :-/ > Please suggest a better name. :) > [ I'm also not happy with the naming but couldn't think of a better one. ] Legacy perhaps? WBR, Sergei