public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>
To: Michael Bramer <michael@debsupport.de>
Cc: Niels de Vos <niels.devos@wincor-nixdorf.com>,
	Tosoni <jp.tosoni@acksys.fr>,
	"'Alan Cox'" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/serial/8250_pci.c (add support for '8-port RS-232 MIC-3620 from advantech'
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:47:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49785CD7.6020800@teltonika.lt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090122110003.GA24450@deb-support.de>

Michael Bramer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:03:53AM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> Tosoni wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:32:15PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
>>>>>>>>  static struct pci_device_id serial_pci_tbl[] = {
>>>>>>>> +       {       PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVANTECH,
>>>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620,
>>>>>>>> +               0x3620, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0,
>>>>>> Why not use PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVANTECH as PCI_SUBVENDOR_ID too?
>>>>> The Advantech vendor id is not 0x3620. This confused me as
>>>> well which is
>>>>> why I asked for an lspci. Advantech has stuck the device id in the
>>>>> subvendor bits and '1' in the subdevice (so it should be 1 not
>>>>> PCI_ANY_ID).
>>>> is this better?
>>>>
>>>> +       {       PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVANTECH,
>>>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620,
>>>> +               PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620, 1, 0, 0,
>>> Since the name describes a device id where it should be a (sub)vendor id,
>>> I would suggest that you add a line of comment to explain the case.
>>> So that no one will be tempted to change it back to PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVANTECH
>>> in the future.
>> Definitely!
> 
> Is the patch now ok?

No :)

> ----
> This Patch add the device information for the
> MIC-3620 8-port RS-232 cPCI card from Advantech Co. Ltd.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Bramer <grisu@deb-support.de>
> --- a/drivers/serial/8250_pci.c	2008-07-13 23:51:29.000000000 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/serial/8250_pci.c	2009-01-17 21:37:37.000000000 +0100
> @@ -769,6 +768,8 @@
>  #define PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_OCTPRO422	0x0208
>  #define PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_POCTAL232	0x0308
>  #define PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_POCTAL422	0x0408
> +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVANTECH         0x13fe
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620 0x3620

Use TABs for indentation here.

>  /*
>   * Master list of serial port init/setup/exit quirks.
> @@ -2054,6 +2041,10 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct pci_device_id serial_pci_tbl[] = {
> +	// Advantech use PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620 (0x3620) as 'PCI_SUBVENDOR_ID'
> +	{	PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADVANTECH, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620,
> +		PCI_DEVICE_ID_ADVANTECH_PCI3620, 1, 0, 0,
> +		pbn_b2_8_921600 },
>  	{	PCI_VENDOR_ID_V3, PCI_DEVICE_ID_V3_V960,
>  		PCI_SUBVENDOR_ID_CONNECT_TECH,
>  		PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_CONNECT_TECH_BH8_232, 0, 0,
> ----
> 
> 
> Gruss
> Grisu

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-22 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-18 13:53 [PATCH] drivers/serial/8250_pci.c (add support for '8-port RS-232 MIC-3620 from advantech' Michael Bramer
2009-01-18 14:14 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-19 11:45   ` Michael Bramer
2009-01-19 14:51 ` Andrey Panin
2009-01-19 23:51   ` Michael Bramer
2009-01-20 15:12     ` Andrey Panin
2009-01-21  7:52       ` Michael Bramer
2009-01-21  8:18         ` Paulius Zaleckas
2009-01-21  8:40           ` Niels de Vos
2009-01-21 12:32             ` Alan Cox
2009-01-21 23:42               ` Michael Bramer
2009-01-22  8:21                 ` Tosoni
2009-01-22  9:03                   ` Niels de Vos
2009-01-22 11:00                     ` Michael Bramer
2009-01-22 11:47                       ` Paulius Zaleckas [this message]
2009-01-22 16:44                         ` Michael Bramer
2009-01-21 23:40           ` Michael Bramer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49785CD7.6020800@teltonika.lt \
    --to=paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jp.tosoni@acksys.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@debsupport.de \
    --cc=niels.devos@wincor-nixdorf.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox