public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Xen-devel" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86: add pte_set_flags/clear_flags	 forpteflag manipulation
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:51:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <497D798C.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <497A3117.2070809@goop.org>

>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> 23.01.09 22:05 >>>
>Jan Beulich wrote:
>> I think a comment (or event a BUG_ON()) should be added here to make
>> clear that this absolutely must not be used to toggle the present bit. I
>> even view toggling _PAGE_PSE as dangerous this way.
>>
>> And alternative would be to make these macros and #undef them (or keep
>> them inline functions but add destructive #define-s) after all their users.
>>   
>
>I don't see any particular problem with changing PSE or even Present 
>with these functions; they don't operate on live in-memory ptes, so its 
>not like they could ever be used to modify a pte unless followed with 
>some kind of set_pte operation.  It is unwise to change any pte flag 
>without knowing what you're doing (though P or PSE would probably have 
>less subtle effects than some of the others).

Whether a pte is live doesn't matter here: If you change P on Xen, the
frame number representation *must* change from/to PFN to/from MFN.
In no case (other than iomem pages) is it allowed to flip just this bit.

Jan


  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-26  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-22 22:24 [PATCH 2/2] x86: add pte_set_flags/clear_flags for pte flag manipulation Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-01-23  8:14 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86: add pte_set_flags/clear_flags for pteflag manipulation Jan Beulich
2009-01-23 21:05   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-01-26  7:51     ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2009-01-26 19:54       ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86: add pte_set_flags/clear_flags forpteflag manipulation Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=497D798C.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox