Re: [Patch] mm tracepoints

Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-06T17:57:20Z

On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:10 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Looks pretty good and useful to me. I've Cc:-ed more mm folks,
> > it would be nice to hear their opinion about these tracepoints.
> >
> > Andrew, Nick, Peter, what do you think?
>
> Bit sad we use the struct mm_struct * as mm identifier (little %lx vs %p
> confusion there too), but I suppose there simply isn't anything better.

> Things missing,

Why only anon and filemap, that misses out on all the funky driver
->fault() handlers.