Re: [Patch] mm tracepoints

Ingo Molnar
2009-03-06T18:02:25Z

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:10 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Looks pretty good and useful to me. I've Cc:-ed more mm folks,
> > > it would be nice to hear their opinion about these tracepoints.
> > >
> > > Andrew, Nick, Peter, what do you think?
> >
> > Bit sad we use the struct mm_struct * as mm identifier (little %lx vs %p
> > confusion there too), but I suppose there simply isn't anything better.
>
> > Things missing,
>
> Why only anon and filemap, that misses out on all the funky
> driver ->fault() handlers.

btw., does it include shm faults? I think all of this would be
handled if the tracepoint was at handle_mm_fault(), right?

Ingo