From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.27.13
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:36:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497F6257.4070101@krogh.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F169D4F5E1F1974DBFAFABF47F60C10A1C2250D0@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com>
Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:01:36PM +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>>> Greg KH wrote:
>>>> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.27.13
>>>> kernel. It contains a wide range of bugfixes, and all users of the
>>>> 2.6.27 kernel series are strongly encouraged to upgrade.
>>>> I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch
>>>> between
>>>> 2.6.27.12 and 2.6.27.13
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I'm getting some e1000 noise on a 2.6.27.6, I search the log up to
>>> .13 but couldn't find any log messsage that looked like it fixed it.
>>>
>>>
>>> [862734.501786] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [862734.501793] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:219
>>> dev_watchdog+0x1f8/0x210() [862734.501795] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0
>>> (e1000): transmit timed out
>> I've been getting a lot of reports about this as well. Did it show up
>> in 2.6.27.6?
>>
>> Netdev developers, any ideas of what would be causing this?
>
> no immediate idea, but a quick test to help isolate which functionality
> could be causing problems is to disable TSO on all four interfaces using
> ethtool.
>
> It could be that GSO is somehow playing into this as well, but I don't
> know why (you could disable it with ethtool too).
>
> It could be unrelated but I've noticed that TCP window size can grow much
> larger now than it used to (especially talking to LRO enabled clients)
> and this might cause some kind of an overflow in the TCP transmit
> offloading hardware in the e1000 parts.
>
>
>>> Complete dmesg here:
>>> http://krogh.cc/~jesper/dmesg-2.6.27.6.txt
>>>
>>> The system is running with bonded interfaces with (lspci output)
>>> 06:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546EB Gigabit
>>> Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 03) 06:01.1 Ethernet controller:
>>> Intel Corporation 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev
>>> 03) 06:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546EB Gigabit
>>> Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 03) 06:02.1 Ethernet controller:
>>> Intel Corporation 82546EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev
>>> 03)
>>>
>>> The system is still "fully functional", and I havent notiched
>>> anything wrong, but there sure is a lot of link ups and downs on
>>> that bond.
>
> in your log I saw one tx timeout for each interface, one first one by itself
> and then several more all within a few minutes, but then no more for
> a really long time.
>
> My first reaction is to ask you what test you're running, and ask you to
> run the e1000_dump code (see google) to dump the tx descriptor rings at
> the time of failure.
>
> I can get you that code with updates if you're willing to test, but
> it might take a couple of days.
I would love to have it at hand, but it is a production system, so it'll
be upgraded to 2.6.27.latest at next reboot. So It should be working
with that one.
Jesper
--
Jesper
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-25 0:48 Linux 2.6.27.13 Greg KH
2009-01-25 0:49 ` Greg KH
2009-01-26 20:01 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-01-26 21:07 ` Greg KH
2009-01-27 0:37 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2009-01-27 19:36 ` Jesper Krogh [this message]
2009-01-28 12:58 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-01-28 19:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-01-29 0:37 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-02-01 13:21 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-02 18:17 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497F6257.4070101@krogh.cc \
--to=jesper@krogh.cc \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox