Re: swiotlb default size (64 MB) too small?

[Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>]

FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:03:40 +0100 (CET)
> Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>> +static void sbp2_unmap_scatterlist(struct device *card_device,
>> +				   struct sbp2_command_orb *orb)
>> +{
>> +	if (scsi_sg_count(orb->cmd))
>> +		dma_unmap_sg(card_device, scsi_sglist(orb->cmd),
>> +			     scsi_sg_count(orb->cmd),
>> +			     orb->cmd->sc_data_direction);
>> +
>> +	if (orb->page_table_bus)
>> +		dma_unmap_single(card_device, orb->page_table_bus,
>> +				 sizeof(orb->page_table), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> 
> Well, this does not look correct since zero can be a valid dma
> address.

Hmm.

> static void sbp2_unmap_scatterlist(struct device *card_device,
> 				   struct sbp2_command_orb *orb)
> {
> 	if (scsi_sg_count(orb->cmd))
> 		dma_unmap_sg(card_device, scsi_sglist(orb->cmd),
> 			     scsi_sg_count(orb->cmd),
> 			     orb->cmd->sc_data_direction);
> 
> 	if (scsi_sg_count(orb->cmd) > 1)
> 		dma_unmap_single(card_device, orb->page_table_bus,
> 				 sizeof(orb->page_table), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> 
> 
> Well, looks cranky a bit but firewire is cranky for me :)

Even if scsi_sg_count(cmd) > 1, the outcome of dma_map_sg() could have
been 1, couldn't it?  So I need to take note of that in another way.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= ---= ===--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/