From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Subject: RFC: running out of x86 boot loader IDs
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:06:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49823683.6060201@zytor.com> (raw)
The 4-bit values used to hold x86 boot loader IDs are near exhaustion.
As a result, I'm proposing an extension protocol and will implement it
in time for the next merge window unless there are objections.
The proposal will be as follows:
- The boot loader IDs (type_of_loader >> 4) E and F will be reserved:
E - extended IDs
F - special uses
F is consistent with the current use of FF for "unknown".
- If the boot loader ID is E, the current pad1 field at 0x226 is
repurposed as an extended loader ID. The reason to use the pad1 field
is that it is present in all headers since version 2.02. The boot
loader ID will simply be: ((extended ID + 0x10) << 4) + (version), where
(version) as before is (type_of_loader & 15). This is the value which
will be reported in /proc/sys/kernel/bootloader_type.
The biggest question is probably: is there a need/desire for an extended
version field, or is four bits enough for existing bootloader needs?
-hpa
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-29 23:06 H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-01-29 23:16 ` RFC: running out of x86 boot loader IDs Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 23:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-30 0:33 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-01-30 0:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-08 0:18 ` [tip:x86/kbuild-phys] x86: add extension fields for bootloader type and version tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49823683.6060201@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox