public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: allow 8 more cpus could be used
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:14:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49823869.4010406@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090129231259.GB29611@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Impact: fix left out MARCO
>>>>
>>>> X86_PC will be always enabled. so need to check if we have bigsmp 
>>>> support built in before cut off more than 8 cpus.
>>> ah, that's a leftover reference to X86_PC. It can now be removed, together 
>>> with the Kconfig X86_PC option.
>>>
>>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_PC) && defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_PC) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP)
>>>>  	if (def_to_bigsmp && nr_cpu_ids > 8) {
>>>>  		unsigned int cpu;
>>>>  		unsigned nr;
>>> Could you please send a patch that removes both X86_PC and X86_BIGSMP - 
>>> and removes the above cutoff code too, so that it will be built-in all the 
>>> time?
>> and at what cost, please?
> 
> the size difference between a bigsmp and a normal-smp x86 defconfig kernel 
> is 0.011%. Zero difference on a UP kernel. (And UP is what most of the 
> ultra-embedded systems are using)

That's static size?  how about cpu and apic table space?


Thanks,
-- 
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-29 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-29 22:18 [PATCH] x86: allow 8 more cpus could be used Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH] x86: don't treat bigsmp as no standard Yinghai Lu
2009-01-30 14:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 22:42 ` [PATCH] x86: allow 8 more cpus could be used Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 22:44   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 23:08     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 23:14       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 23:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 22:44   ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-29 23:12     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 23:14       ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-01-29 23:22         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 23:23           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 23:25           ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-30  0:09             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49823869.4010406@oracle.com \
    --to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox