From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: allow 8 more cpus could be used
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:14:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49823869.4010406@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090129231259.GB29611@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Impact: fix left out MARCO
>>>>
>>>> X86_PC will be always enabled. so need to check if we have bigsmp
>>>> support built in before cut off more than 8 cpus.
>>> ah, that's a leftover reference to X86_PC. It can now be removed, together
>>> with the Kconfig X86_PC option.
>>>
>>>> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_PC) && defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
>>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_PC) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP)
>>>> if (def_to_bigsmp && nr_cpu_ids > 8) {
>>>> unsigned int cpu;
>>>> unsigned nr;
>>> Could you please send a patch that removes both X86_PC and X86_BIGSMP -
>>> and removes the above cutoff code too, so that it will be built-in all the
>>> time?
>> and at what cost, please?
>
> the size difference between a bigsmp and a normal-smp x86 defconfig kernel
> is 0.011%. Zero difference on a UP kernel. (And UP is what most of the
> ultra-embedded systems are using)
That's static size? how about cpu and apic table space?
Thanks,
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-29 22:18 [PATCH] x86: allow 8 more cpus could be used Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH] x86: don't treat bigsmp as no standard Yinghai Lu
2009-01-30 14:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 22:42 ` [PATCH] x86: allow 8 more cpus could be used Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 22:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 23:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 23:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 23:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 22:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-29 23:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 23:14 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-01-29 23:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 23:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 23:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-30 0:09 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49823869.4010406@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox