From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
x86@kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
cpw@sgi.com
Subject: Re: #tj-percpu has been rebased
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:46:59 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4983E5D3.3040100@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49833350.1020809@kernel.org>
Hello, again.
Please disregard the previous two rebased trees. There has been a
major communication misunderstanding between Ingo and me leading to
the rebased branches. Here is yet another, hopefully final, merged
tree which builds on top of tip/core/percpu and took only about ten
minutes as opposed to hours. :-)
* Three xen fix related patches merged. Later threes conflicted in
non-minor way. Requested refresh.
* Cliff Wickman's UV flush fix patch revived and merged.
* Pull in linus#master[1].
Anyways, please pull from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu
The commit ID should be da2c0b021cde94866f1e492f940aad29e8f61258.
Sorry about the mess but this one should be the safe one to post
patches against.
Thanks.
--
tejun
[1] 33bfad54b58cf05cfe6678c3ec9235d4bc8db4c2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-31 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-30 17:05 #tj-percpu has been rebased Tejun Heo
2009-01-31 5:46 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-01-31 13:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 9:04 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-04 3:18 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-12 3:37 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-12 3:44 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-13 20:58 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-13 21:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-13 22:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-14 0:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-14 1:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-14 2:10 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-16 7:23 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-16 17:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-16 23:22 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-16 23:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-18 4:25 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-18 6:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-18 7:11 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4983E5D3.3040100@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox