From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: main thread pthread_exit/sys_exit bug!
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:17:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <498754EF.8090604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090202165606.GA13346@redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I am worried this patch can confuse the user-space. Because, when
> the main thread does sys_exit(), the user-space has all rights
> to assume it exits ;) But with this patch the main thread will
> continue to handle the signals until the while group exits, I'm
> afraid libpthread.so won't be happy.
I haven't looked at the patch nor tried it.
If the patch changes the behavior that the main thread, after calling
sys_exit, still react to signals sent to this thread or to the process
as a whole, then the patch is wrong. The userlevel context of the
thread is not usable anymore. It will have run all kinds of
destructors. The current behavior is AFAIK that the main thread won't
react to any signal anymore. That is absolutely required.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmHVO8ACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHTJvwCgodxkT+mg0tmrnlhf/IP8hUQc
RYIAn0YC7pTjPHHZa7kmvYSyu/Zw5IIT
=ehdX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-02 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-01 22:32 main thread pthread_exit/sys_exit bug! Kaz Kylheku
[not found] ` <20090201174159.4a52e15c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2009-02-02 6:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-02 7:10 ` Kaz Kylheku
2009-02-02 16:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-02 20:10 ` Kaz Kylheku
2009-02-02 20:17 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2009-02-02 20:39 ` Kaz Kylheku
2009-02-03 2:39 ` Kaz Kylheku
2009-02-03 13:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-03 19:51 ` Kaz Kylheku
2009-02-03 21:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-03 23:06 ` Kaz Kylheku
2009-02-05 3:05 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-05 4:55 ` Kaz Kylheku
2009-02-05 16:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-05 21:22 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-05 23:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-09 3:33 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-09 4:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-09 5:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=498754EF.8090604@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kkylheku@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox