From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756682AbZBBWzZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:55:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752913AbZBBWzL (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:55:11 -0500 Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com ([47.129.242.56]:50996 "EHLO zcars04e.nortel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752725AbZBBWzK (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:55:10 -0500 Message-ID: <498779C2.2060908@nortel.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:54:58 -0600 From: "Chris Friesen" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: cgroup mount point References: <20090202200013.GU3643@vespa.holoscopio.com> <1233606371.15779.32.camel@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20090202205246.GA28593@glandium.org> <20090202214153.GV3643@vespa.holoscopio.com> In-Reply-To: <20090202214153.GV3643@vespa.holoscopio.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2009 22:55:02.0585 (UTC) FILETIME=[483EAA90:01C98589] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > Linux Documentation is not consistent and have some funny options. In > Documentation/cgroups/*, we have: > So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers, /dev/cpuset, > /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cpuset. > > I am copying the container and the kernel guys. Perhaps, we can find an > agreement (if we want to find one at all) and change all that > Documentation to get consistent. I'd vote for "cgroups" or "containers", mounted at / or /sys/. /opt feels more like where software should live, and /dev should be for devices rather than capabilities/management. "cpuctl" and "cpuset" are subsets of the full capabilities of cgroups, so they're suboptimal as far as naming. Chris