From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cl@linux-foundation.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: fix allocating page cache/slab object on the unallowed node when memory spread is set
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:31:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4989606F.9030804@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830902031449j1fa3dd08re842b57f8700b389@mail.gmail.com>
on 2009-2-4 6:49 Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:25:25 +0800
>> Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> I wasn't able to find out where the setting of init'smems_allowed
>> happens, after a bit of grepping and hunting. It should be done within
>> INIT_TASK, but isn't.
>>
>> Still, kthreadd is reliably parented by swapper, and there shold be no
>> need to alter its mems_allowed.
>>
>> Similarly, what was the reason for setting current->mems_allowed in
>> kernel_init()? That also should be unneeded.
>>
>> Finally, I've somewhat lost track of where we are with this patch.
>> Paul, do you see any other remaining issues?
>
> AFAICS this patch still has a race between a thread reading its
> mems_allowed, and another thread updating it. The current architecture
> of having task->mems_allowed be only updatable by current was PaulJ's
> code originally, and I'm a bit loathe to touch it. But if we're going
> to, we'll need at the minimum to add a lock for any code that touches
> current->mems_allowed.
Agree! But mems_allowed is touched in the module of memory management
in general, adding a lock to protect mems_allowed may lead to performance
regression.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 8:06 [PATCH] cpuset: fix allocating page cache/slab object on the unallowed node when memory spread is set Miao Xie
2009-01-21 8:30 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-21 10:41 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-03 3:05 ` Miao Xie
2009-01-27 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 16:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-03 3:25 ` Miao Xie
2009-02-03 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-03 22:49 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-04 9:31 ` Miao Xie [this message]
2009-02-06 19:19 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-09 4:02 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10 11:37 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-12 0:54 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12 1:19 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-12 1:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12 1:58 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-12 8:23 ` Miao Xie
2009-02-12 21:53 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-12 8:27 ` Miao Xie
2009-02-12 10:40 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12 5:57 ` Miao Xie
2009-02-12 11:06 ` Paul Jackson
2009-02-04 9:03 ` Miao Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4989606F.9030804@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox