From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix hpet timer reinit for x86_64
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:51:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4989814F.1030000@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3myd21ldn.wl%vmayatsk@redhat.com>
Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
> At Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:40:31 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> There's a small problem with hpet_rtc_reinit function - it checks
>> for the
>> hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - hpet_t1_cmp > 0
>> to continue increasing both the HPET_T1_CMP (register) and the
>> hpet_t1_cmp (variable).
>>
>> But since the HPET_COUNTER is always 32-bit, if the hpet_t1_cmp
>> is 64-bit this condition will always be FALSE once the latter hits
>> the 32-bit boundary, and we can have a situation, when we don't
>> increase the HPET_T1_CMP register high enough.
>>
>> The result - timer stops ticking, since HPET_T1_CMP becomes less,
>> than the COUNTER and never increased again.
>>
>> The solution is to cut the upper 32-bit from the hpet_t1_cmp
>> variable to make the comparison to HPET_COUNTER correct.
>
> Why not to use u32 as a type for hpet_t1_cmp then?
That's the matter of taste from my POV, so I can re-send the patch
if x86 maintainers agree with your version.
> --
> wbr, Vitaly
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-04 10:40 [PATCH] x86: fix hpet timer reinit for x86_64 Pavel Emelyanov
2009-02-04 11:39 ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-02-04 11:43 ` Kirill Korotaev
2009-02-04 11:51 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2009-02-04 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 8:01 ` Kirill Korotaev
2009-02-05 14:53 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4989814F.1030000@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=v.mayatskih@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox