public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: style fascism for xen assemblies
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 02:42:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <498B24FA.2020605@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498B226A.2020900@goop.org>

Hello,

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> I don't really like what you've done here.  There are two problems:
> 
>    * If you're going to convert comments of the form
> 
>      /* This is a small comment which
>         happens to be longer than a line. */
>         
>      then you should convert it to full winged-style, rather than just
>      sticking '*' on the front of the second line.

I find fully winged style a bit excessive when a comment is in the
middle of code and not very long so I kind of just chose middleground.

>    * All the big block comments look crowded and cramped now, which
>      makes them harder to read and maintain.  All those '*'s are just
>      visual noise. (They make a bit more sense in C code to distinguish
>      comment from code, but asm code looks so different from comment
>      that they're not necessary here.)
> 
> But Ingo's already pulled it, so I guess I'm stuck with it.

Yeap, I really didn't expect everyone to be happy about it.  Style
cleanups always get ugly, so the fasicm joke on the subject.  Anyways,
if you feel strong against it, please feel free to change.  I
personally don't mind one way or the other.  I just wanted to make
things more consistent while at it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-05 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-31  1:42 [PATCH 2/3] xen: make direct versions of irq_enable/disable/save/restore to common code Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05  6:31 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-05 15:00   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 16:04     ` [PATCH] x86: style fascism for xen assemblies Tejun Heo
2009-02-05 16:57       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 17:31       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 17:34         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 17:42         ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=498B24FA.2020605@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox