From: "Thomas Hellström" <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 pat issue
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:43:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <498C062C.201@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1tz78pdwy.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> writes:
>
>
>
>> Indeed, it's crucial to keep the mappings consistent, but failure to do so is a
>> kernel driver bug, it should never be the result of invalid user data.
>>
>
> It easily can be. Think of an X server mmaping frame buffers. Or other
> device bars.
>
>
Hmm, Yes you're right, although I'm still a bit doubtful about RAM pages.
Wait. Now I see what's causing the problems. The code is assuming that
VM_PFNMAP vmas never map RAM pages. That's also an invalid assumption.
See comments in mm/memory.c
So probably the attribute check should be done for the insert_pfn path
of VM_MIXEDMAP as well. That's not done today.
So there are three distinct bugs at this point:
1) VMAs with VM_PFNMAP are incorrectly assumed to be linear if
vma->vm_pgoff non-null.
2) VM_PFNMAP VMA PTEs are incorrectly assumed to never point to physical
RAM.
3) There is no check for the insert_pfn path of vm_insert_mixed().
>
>> IMHO checking each vm_insert_pfn() for caching attribute correctness is not
>> something that should be enabled by default, due to the CPU overhead. Production
>> drivers should never violate this.
>>
>
> If it is a problem the implementation should become more efficient. Userspace
> as well as drivers can generate these mappings so even with a perfect driver
> you cannot guarantee that someone else does not have that area of memory
> mapped differently.
>
OK, So there seems to be a couple of things that can be done for
performance here:
1) A fastpath for single pages.
2) RAM pages are tracked with a page bit today.
Why not say "all memory backed by a struct page" should be tracked with
a page bit. Then pfn_valid() could be used instead of page_is_ram().
This, combined with 1) should make tracking struct page backed pages
extremely fast.
3) If vm_insert_pfn() happens to be used on a linear VMA, it looks like
the whole VMA is being validated for each vm_insert_pfn(), which seems
extremely inefficient, considering the extensive tests in pagerame_is_ram().
/Thomas
> Eric
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-06 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-05 12:47 2.6.29 pat issue Thomas Hellström
2009-02-05 18:03 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-05 21:32 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-02-05 23:08 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-06 9:51 ` Thomas Hellström
2009-02-06 1:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-06 9:43 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2009-03-04 6:08 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-04 9:56 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-06 22:38 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-06 23:44 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-10 1:39 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-10 8:22 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-10 17:42 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-11 9:17 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-03-11 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-11 17:54 ` [PATCH] VM, x86, PAT: Change implementation of is_linear_pfn_mapping Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-11 22:09 ` Frans Pop
2009-03-12 0:31 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-12 3:22 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-12 5:45 ` Frans Pop
2009-03-12 18:59 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-12 20:30 ` Frans Pop
2009-03-12 22:48 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-13 0:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 0:45 ` [PATCH] VM, x86, PAT: Change is_linear_pfn_mapping to not use vm_pgoff Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-13 4:03 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-13 16:25 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 17:00 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-14 2:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-13 23:35 ` [PATCH] Add a new vm flag to track full pfnmap at mmap Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-03-14 2:53 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-14 8:54 ` [tip:x86/urgent] VM, x86, PAT: add " Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=498C062C.201@vmware.com \
--to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox