* [GIT PULL] x86: unify some of kernel/irq*.c
@ 2009-02-07 0:31 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2009-02-07 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Xen-devel
These changes factor out the differences between 32 and 64-bit do_IRQ
and unify the rest. Unfortunately there are still quite a few other
differences (like interrupt stack handling) which preclude further easy
unification.
Thanks,
J
The following changes since commit f21daa4d04885a34d1972afa9f82a8aebb6152bb:
Ingo Molnar (1):
Merge branch 'out-of-tree'
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git jsgf/x86/unify-irq
Jeremy Fitzhardinge (2):
x86: add handle_irq() to allow interrupt injection
x86: unify do_IRQ()
arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h | 4 +++-
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c | 29 +++++------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c | 34 +++++-----------------------------
4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [GIT PULL] x86: unify some of kernel/irq*.c
2009-02-07 0:31 [GIT PULL] x86: unify some of kernel/irq*.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
@ 2009-02-09 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-02-09 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Xen-devel
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> These changes factor out the differences between 32 and 64-bit do_IRQ
> and unify the rest. Unfortunately there are still quite a few other
> differences (like interrupt stack handling) which preclude further easy
> unification.
>
> Thanks,
> J
>
> The following changes since commit f21daa4d04885a34d1972afa9f82a8aebb6152bb:
> Ingo Molnar (1):
> Merge branch 'out-of-tree'
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git jsgf/x86/unify-irq
>
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge (2):
> x86: add handle_irq() to allow interrupt injection
Why doesnt Xen use a special irqchip, instead of this private hook/layer
in the lowlevel x86 arch level?
irqchip is at least well-specified and widely used. do_IRQ() internals
on the other hand will become a Xen special quickly. Also, adding a
needless function call there obviously does not help native performance.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-09 10:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-07 0:31 [GIT PULL] x86: unify some of kernel/irq*.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox