From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755391AbZBGDTf (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:19:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752523AbZBGDTZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:19:25 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:35872 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750745AbZBGDTY (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:19:24 -0500 Message-ID: <498CFD95.5070004@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:18:45 -0800 From: Yinghai Lu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: state of some x86 acpi patches References: <4947FF4C.80706@goop.org> <20081216192534.GB843@elte.hu> <495C677F.6080707@goop.org> <20090102153957.GA1180@elte.hu> <4980EE0C.4070308@goop.org> <49810211.9030808@kernel.org> <498CF8DA.30004@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <498CF8DA.30004@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Yinghai Lu wrote: >> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> >>> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> >>>> yes, that end result is the desired state of things. We did run with >>>> this for several months and resolved all the cases that needed fixing, >>>> but dropped them when the ACPI tree moved out from under us. >>>> >>>> Can resurrect it if Len feels OK about the concept. Len, you shouldnt >>>> worry about conflicts - we can do it after the ACPI changes of this >>>> merge window are upstream so there should be no conflict trouble at >>>> all. How does that sound? >>>> >>> Doesn't look like these changes made it in this time. Did they get >>> overlooked, or did some other problem come up? Or did you want me to >>> dig them up? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> J >>> >> >> >> please check attached that are updated to today tip/master with ingo's >> genapic patchset.. >> > > The look OK, but they didn't get merged into tip/master? > Ingo is too busy... It seems Len already agreed those patches can go through tip. Ingo? YH