From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: include/linux/irq.h:452: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_to_node'
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:05:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4990A899.8070302@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090209203502.GA7701@x200.localdomain>
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:38:25PM -0800, Mike Travis wrote:
>> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>>> On mips-malta:
>>>
>>> CC arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-int.o
>>> In file included from arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-int.c:25:
>>> include/linux/irq.h: In function 'init_alloc_desc_masks':
>>> include/linux/irq.h:452: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_to_node'
>>> include/linux/irq.h:454: error: 'GFP_ATOMIC' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>>
>>> I _think_ init_alloc_desc_masks() should be made out of line to fix this.
>> Hi Alexey,
>>
>> Does adding #include <linux/slab.h> fix the error? If so, I can add this to
>> linux/irq.h.
>>
>> The primary reason it's inline is that unless CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y, then the
>> entire routine is a NOP which optimizes out more completely as an inline function.
>
> linux/slab.h helps.
Hi Alexey,
Since you reported this problem a similar issue was discovered on s390. However
the fix for that was to include interrupt.h instead of irq.h.
Could you try this as well?
Here's a tail end pointer to the thread and Andrew's commit msg including the
patch is below.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=123360349631362&w=4
Thanks!
Mike
---
Subject: + sysrq-include-interrupth-instead-of-irqh.patch added to -mm tree
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
travis@sgi.com
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:24:08 -0800
The patch titled
sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
sysrq-include-interrupth-instead-of-irqh.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
With "cpumask: update irq_desc to use cpumask_var_t" in linux-next
we get this compile bug on s390:
CC drivers/char/sysrq.o
In file included from drivers/char/sysrq.c:38:
include/linux/irq.h: In function 'init_alloc_desc_masks':
include/linux/irq.h:442: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
drivers/char/sysrq.c should include interrupt.h instead of irq.h.
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/char/sysrq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN drivers/char/sysrq.c~sysrq-include-interrupth-instead-of-irqh drivers/char/sysrq.c
--- a/drivers/char/sysrq.c~sysrq-include-interrupth-instead-of-irqh
+++ a/drivers/char/sysrq.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
#include <linux/vt_kern.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/kexec.h>
-#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
#include <linux/oom.h>
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com are
origin.patch
alpha-use-syscall-wrappers.patch
linux-next.patch
sysrq-include-interrupth-instead-of-irqh.patch
kmalloc-return-null-instead-of-link-failure.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-09 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 21:53 include/linux/irq.h:452: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_to_node' Alexey Dobriyan
2009-01-21 23:38 ` Mike Travis
2009-02-09 20:35 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-09 22:05 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2009-02-09 22:08 ` Mike Travis
2009-02-09 22:29 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-09 22:32 ` Mike Travis
2009-02-09 22:40 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-09 23:06 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4990A899.8070302@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox