From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [cgroup or VFS ?] INFO: possible recursive locking detected
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:19:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49910E55.7050905@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090210043733.GY28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:06:39AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>
>> BTW, I found another bug in current code:
>
> Why is that a bug? If _anything_ had been trying to acquire the
> rwsem in question, it would be fscked anyway. Not to mention
> that nothing could have ever seen that struct super_block in this
> particular case, as a general rule
> * if something might be blocked on your mutex/rwsem or spinning
> on a spinlock, releasing it before you free the object won't save your
> arse.
> You have no promise whatsoever that whoever's been trying to
> get the lock in question will even get out of the locking primitive
> before the memory that contains the lock gets freed. In case of superblocks
> in general, you don't free them until ->s_count hits zero. At that point
> anything as much as remembering the address of that superblock is already
> FUBAR.
>
This is not the general case. This sb won't be seen by anyone, and destroy_super()
is called on a sb with ->s_count == 1 and ->s_umount held.
Actually I ran into this after Peter's patch applied:
=========================
[ BUG: held lock freed! ]
-------------------------
mount/13413 is freeing memory e767a800-e767abff, with a lock still held there!
(&type->s_umount_key#29/1){--..}, at: [<c04a4104>] sget+0x1ea/0x324
2 locks held by mount/13413:
#0: (&type->s_umount_key#29/1){--..}, at: [<c04a4104>] sget+0x1ea/0x324
#1: (&type->s_umount_key#30){--..}, at: [<c04a3f72>] sget+0x58/0x324
stack backtrace:
Pid: 13413, comm: mount Not tainted 2.6.29-rc4 #548
Call Trace:
[<c044d865>] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0xc9/0x105
[<c049c86d>] kfree+0x82/0xd1
[<c04a41e0>] ? sget+0x2c6/0x324
[<c04a41e0>] sget+0x2c6/0x324
[<c045dda9>] ? cgroup_set_super+0x0/0x3e
[<c045cf6f>] ? cgroup_test_super+0x0/0x2f
[<c045f840>] cgroup_get_sb+0x8d/0x284
[<c0489216>] ? kstrdup+0x31/0x53
[<c04a46aa>] vfs_kern_mount+0x40/0x7b
[<c04a4733>] do_kern_mount+0x37/0xbf
[<c04b5dc6>] do_mount+0x5c4/0x61b
[<c04b477a>] ? copy_mount_options+0x2c/0x111
[<c04b5e86>] sys_mount+0x69/0xa0
[<c0403351>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-10 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 3:23 [cgroup or VFS ?] INFO: possible recursive locking detected Li Zefan
2009-01-08 3:45 ` Li Zefan
2009-02-09 11:23 ` Al Viro
2009-02-09 11:38 ` Li Zefan
2009-02-09 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-10 3:06 ` Li Zefan
2009-02-10 4:37 ` Al Viro
2009-02-10 5:19 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2009-02-10 6:07 ` Al Viro
2009-02-10 9:25 ` Li Zefan
2009-02-12 6:14 ` Li Zefan
2009-02-10 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49910E55.7050905@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox