public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: [PATCH x86#core/percpu] x86: fix x86_32 stack protector bugs
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:31:00 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49927EB4.3050507@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49919FA2.9050309@kernel.org>

Impact: fix x86_32 stack protector

Brian Gerst found out that %gs was being initialized to stack_canary
instead of stack_canary - 20, which basically gave the same canary
value for all threads.  Fixing this also exposed the following bugs.

* cpu_idle() didn't call boot_init_stack_canary()

* stack canary switching in switch_to() was being done too late making
  the initial run of a new thread use the old stack canary value.

Fix all of them and while at it update comment in cpu_idle() about
calling boot_init_stack_canary().

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h |    2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/system.h         |    8 +++-----
 arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S             |    1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c          |   10 ++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c          |   11 +++++------
 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
index fa7e5bd..c2d742c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
 static inline void setup_stack_canary_segment(int cpu)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-	unsigned long canary = (unsigned long)&per_cpu(stack_canary, cpu);
+	unsigned long canary = (unsigned long)&per_cpu(stack_canary, cpu) - 20;
 	struct desc_struct *gdt_table = get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu);
 	struct desc_struct desc;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
index 2692ee8..7a80f72 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h
@@ -25,13 +25,11 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
 #define __switch_canary							\
-	"movl "__percpu_arg([current_task])",%%ebx\n\t"			\
-	"movl %P[task_canary](%%ebx),%%ebx\n\t"				\
-	"movl %%ebx,"__percpu_arg([stack_canary])"\n\t"
+	"movl %P[task_canary](%[next]), %%ebx\n\t"			\
+	"movl %%ebx, "__percpu_arg([stack_canary])"\n\t"
 #define __switch_canary_oparam						\
 	, [stack_canary] "=m" (per_cpu_var(stack_canary))
 #define __switch_canary_iparam						\
-	, [current_task] "m" (per_cpu_var(current_task))		\
 	, [task_canary] "i" (offsetof(struct task_struct, stack_canary))
 #else	/* CC_STACKPROTECTOR */
 #define __switch_canary
@@ -60,9 +58,9 @@ do {									\
 		     "movl %[next_sp],%%esp\n\t"	/* restore ESP   */ \
 		     "movl $1f,%[prev_ip]\n\t"	/* save    EIP   */	\
 		     "pushl %[next_ip]\n\t"	/* restore EIP   */	\
+		     __switch_canary					\
 		     "jmp __switch_to\n"	/* regparm call  */	\
 		     "1:\t"						\
-		     __switch_canary					\
 		     "popl %%ebp\n\t"		/* restore EBP   */	\
 		     "popfl\n"			/* restore flags */	\
 									\
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
index 924e316..cf21fd0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
@@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ is386:	movl $2,%ecx		# set MP
 	jne 1f
 	movl $per_cpu__gdt_page,%eax
 	movl $per_cpu__stack_canary,%ecx
+	subl $20, %ecx
 	movw %cx, 8 * GDT_ENTRY_STACK_CANARY + 2(%eax)
 	shrl $16, %ecx
 	movb %cl, 8 * GDT_ENTRY_STACK_CANARY + 4(%eax)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index 9a62383..b50604b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 
 #include <stdarg.h>
 
+#include <linux/stackprotector.h>
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
@@ -91,6 +92,15 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
+	/*
+	 * If we're the non-boot CPU, nothing set the stack canary up
+	 * for us.  CPU0 already has it initialized but no harm in
+	 * doing it again.  This is a good place for updating it, as
+	 * we wont ever return from this function (so the invalid
+	 * canaries already on the stack wont ever trigger).
+	 */
+	boot_init_stack_canary();
+
 	current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
 
 	/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index 8eb169e..836ef65 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -120,12 +120,11 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
 	current_thread_info()->status |= TS_POLLING;
 
 	/*
-	 * If we're the non-boot CPU, nothing set the PDA stack
-	 * canary up for us - and if we are the boot CPU we have
-	 * a 0 stack canary. This is a good place for updating
-	 * it, as we wont ever return from this function (so the
-	 * invalid canaries already on the stack wont ever
-	 * trigger):
+	 * If we're the non-boot CPU, nothing set the stack canary up
+	 * for us.  CPU0 already has it initialized but no harm in
+	 * doing it again.  This is a good place for updating it, as
+	 * we wont ever return from this function (so the invalid
+	 * canaries already on the stack wont ever trigger).
 	 */
 	boot_init_stack_canary();
 
-- 
1.6.0.2


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-11  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-09 13:39 [PATCHSET x86/master] add stack protector support for x86_32 Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86: include correct %gs in a.out core dump Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 17:12   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86: math_emu info cleanup Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:42   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 13:45     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 13:52       ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86: fix math_emu register frame access Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 17:13   ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-09 23:40     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10  1:08     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] elf: add ELF_CORE_COPY_KERNEL_REGS() Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86: stackprotector.h misc update Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] stackprotector: update make rules Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86: no stack protector for vdso Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86: use asm .macro instead of cpp #define in entry_32.S Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 18:34   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10  1:14     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10  1:18       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10 11:11         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86: add %gs accessors for x86_32 Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86: make lazy %gs optional on x86_32 Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 18:12   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-10  1:27     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10  1:51       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-09 13:39 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86: implement x86_32 stack protector Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 15:25   ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-10 15:39     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-11  7:31       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-02-11 10:34         ` [PATCH x86#core/percpu] x86: fix x86_32 stack protector bugs Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 14:18           ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-09 13:55 ` [PATCHSET x86/master] add stack protector support for x86_32 Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 14:06   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 20:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 13:56       ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:16         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 14:12   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 13:54     ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:16       ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10 14:26           ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-11 10:57             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 11:18               ` [PATCH] stackprotector: fix multi-word cross-builds Ingo Molnar
2009-02-11 14:19                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-10 14:19       ` [PATCHSET x86/master] add stack protector support for x86_32 Ingo Molnar
2009-02-09 14:09 ` Brian Gerst
2009-02-09 14:15   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-10  1:36     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49927EB4.3050507@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox