Re: [PATCHv6] lis3lv02d: support both one- and two-byte sensors

["Éric Piel" <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>]

Giuseppe Bilotta schreef:
:
> Same as v5, with a couple of renames to have simpler and more meaningful
> names. The #define's for the LISxxxxx families have been renamed
> according to the actual functional distinction, and the struct member
> holding the data read function has been renamed to read_data.
> 
Almost good... just a little thing more:
> @@ -254,10 +270,21 @@ static int lis3lv02d_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>  	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_MDPS_CLASS);
>  	device->driver_data = &adev;
>  
> -	lis3lv02d_acpi_read(device->handle, WHO_AM_I, &val);
> -	if ((val != LIS3LV02DL_ID) && (val != LIS302DL_ID)) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR DRIVER_NAME
> -				": Accelerometer chip not LIS3LV02D{L,Q}\n");
> +	lis3lv02d_acpi_read(device->handle, WHO_AM_I, &adev.whoami);
> +	switch (adev.whoami) {
> +		case LIS_DOUBLE_ID:
> +			printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": 2-byte sensor found\n");
> +			adev.read_data = lis3lv02d_read_16;
> +			adev.mdps_max_val = 2048;
> +			break;
> +		case LIS_SINGLE_ID:
> +			printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": 1-byte sensor found\n");
> +			adev.read_data = lis3lv02d_read_8;
> +			adev.mdps_max_val = 128;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			printk(KERN_ERR DRIVER_NAME
> +				": unknown sensor type 0x%X\n", adev.whoami);
>  	}

In the default case, add:
			return -EINVAL;
I don't want the driver to start messing with chips we have no idea what
they do!

Eric