Re: #tj-percpu has been rebased

[Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>]

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:16:59 Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> Anyways, please pull from
>>>>
>>>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu
>>> Thanks.  cpualloc patches rebased on top of it (I had to include the module
>>> patch I've got queued for 2.6.29, otherwise gratuitous conflicts):
>>>
>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/tj-percpu-cpualloc master
>>>
>>> Boot tested here, but that's no guarantee that something didn't break.
>>>
>>> I'm going to be occupied with finishing off cpumask_t this cycle, so I'd be
>>> happy for you to take ownership of any and all of these that you want to keep.
>>> I'll try to keep up with other patches as you post them.
>> Will merge it in this week.
> 
> Okay, just went through the patchset.  It generally looks nice and
> clean but I'm still a bit hung up on the idea of making percpu area
> resizable.  I'll look into Christoph Lameter's cpu_alloc patchset too
> and think about it more.

Oops, those are the same ones.  I'll give a shot at cooking up
something which can be dynamically sized before going forward with
this one.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun