From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758099AbZBLDoy (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:44:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752359AbZBLDop (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:44:45 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:46672 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756561AbZBLDop (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:44:45 -0500 Message-ID: <49939B08.1050801@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:44:08 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , cpw@sgi.com Subject: Re: #tj-percpu has been rebased References: <49833350.1020809@kernel.org> <4983E5D3.3040100@kernel.org> <200902021934.14168.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <498908F9.9040901@kernel.org> <49939964.4070607@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <49939964.4070607@kernel.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > Tejun Heo wrote: >> Rusty Russell wrote: >>> On Saturday 31 January 2009 16:16:59 Tejun Heo wrote: >>>> Anyways, please pull from >>>> >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu >>> Thanks. cpualloc patches rebased on top of it (I had to include the module >>> patch I've got queued for 2.6.29, otherwise gratuitous conflicts): >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/tj-percpu-cpualloc master >>> >>> Boot tested here, but that's no guarantee that something didn't break. >>> >>> I'm going to be occupied with finishing off cpumask_t this cycle, so I'd be >>> happy for you to take ownership of any and all of these that you want to keep. >>> I'll try to keep up with other patches as you post them. >> Will merge it in this week. > > Okay, just went through the patchset. It generally looks nice and > clean but I'm still a bit hung up on the idea of making percpu area > resizable. I'll look into Christoph Lameter's cpu_alloc patchset too > and think about it more. Oops, those are the same ones. I'll give a shot at cooking up something which can be dynamically sized before going forward with this one. Thanks. -- tejun