From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761502AbZBMQiy (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:38:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758310AbZBMQiq (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:38:46 -0500 Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com ([141.146.126.233]:47406 "EHLO acsinet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757675AbZBMQip (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:38:45 -0500 Message-ID: <4995A20A.2060802@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:38:34 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap Organization: Oracle Linux Engineering User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] x86_32: fix printk formats References: <20090212194408.ff7489c1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <49946DB8.9030801@oracle.com> <20090213082556.GB4606@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090213082556.GB4606@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsmt703.oracle.com [141.146.40.81] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090206.4995A1E9.02CF:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> From: Randy Dunlap >> >> Fix printk format warnings and also change 2 %ld to %lu for unsigned long >> variables. >> >> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c:727: warning: format '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' >> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c:735: warning: format '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' >> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap >> --- >> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Already fixed in the x86 tree, but thanks. OK, but this still shows up in linux-next of 20090213. Did the fix just miss the today's pull or is there a git #branch issue or what? Thanks, -- ~Randy