From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86: memtest: adapt log messages
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:46:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4995B1E7.4070908@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234544696.26783.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 17:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>>> + printk(KERN_CONT "\n %010llx - %010llx pattern %016llx",
>>> + t_start, t_start + t_size, cpu_to_be64(pattern));
>>> +#else
>>> + printk(KERN_CONT "\n %010llx - %010llx pattern %08x",
>>> + t_start, t_start + t_size, cpu_to_be32(pattern));
>>> +#endif
>> hm, is there really no cleaner way to do this?
>
> Can we use this:
>
> + printk(KERN_CONT "\n %010llx - %010llx pattern %016llx",
> + t_start, t_start + t_size, cpu_to_be64(pattern));
>
Only if you don't mind 8 extra zeros on 32 bits.
There are other problems with this, too. There is a KERN_CONT at the
end of it, but it starts a new line, and then doesn't have another
priority flag.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-13 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-13 14:46 [PATCH 0/7] x86: memtest update Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-13 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86: memtest: reuse test patterns when memtest parameter exceeds number of available patterns Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-13 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86: memtest: introduce array to store memtest patterns Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-13 17:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-17 10:24 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-17 20:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-13 14:52 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86: memtest: cleanup memtest function Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-13 14:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86: memtest: adapt log messages Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-13 16:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-13 17:04 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-13 17:46 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-02-17 10:27 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-17 10:29 ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-13 14:57 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: memtest: add additional (silly) test patterns Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-13 14:59 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86: memtest: wipe out test pattern from memory Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-13 15:00 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86: update description for memtest boot parameter Andreas Herrmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-25 10:23 [PATCH 0/7 v2] x86: memtest update Andreas Herrmann
2009-02-25 10:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86: memtest: adapt log messages Andreas Herrmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4995B1E7.4070908@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox