From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760331AbZBMSR0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:17:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752141AbZBMSRS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:17:18 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:39886 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751913AbZBMSRS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:17:18 -0500 Message-ID: <4995B83C.6000108@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:13:16 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Junio C Hamano CC: Lennart Sorensen , Ingo Oeser , Peter Zijlstra , L-K , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: git-send-email References: <1234451714.10603.22.camel@laptop> <200902121825.35021.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> <20090212192104.GD15809@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <7vmycrf5dv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <7vmycrf5dv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I personally prefer the former, but as you hopefully all found out by now, > the choice between these two is just the matter of personal taste, and > there is no clear majority. > Quite on the contrary. I think there is a clear majority in favor of --no-chain-reply-to. Let me add my voice to that chorus, too. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.