From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752947AbZBNTCT (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:02:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751808AbZBNTCI (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:02:08 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.217.222]:58479 "EHLO mail-gx0-f222.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751611AbZBNTCH (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:02:07 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:newsgroups:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=fkDeNVdsYkhutPBgKAnTaCFP+4mA28hL7ayws32w1g43fqU/y8h0ye5ngGIJmeaVnA oxFS0XvawHO/5cQfVsSqr5lJ23AUf4ApWHjjObwyE7Vm88u89sHfS7I7AmfiTC/FKD6E mAFIaDIat8d4Uj2WaotPJXlp15XJ5SVyUmFfQ= Message-ID: <49971528.4080405@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:02:00 -0600 From: Robert Hancock User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel To: Michael Riepe CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: install firmware in a kernel-dependent directory References: <4996B838.2070205@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4996B838.2070205@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Riepe wrote: > Currently, make firmware_install puts all firmware blobs in > /lib/firmware. If you have several kernel versions installed, they will > overwrite each other's files, which may lead to problems if the blobs > eventually change. I think it would be better to use a separate > directory for every kernel version, like /lib/firmware/$(uname -r) or > /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/firmware (the latter is my favorite). > > In either case, only a minimal modification in /lib/udev/firmware.sh is > required to make it look in the new directory first. > > Comments? Seems reasonable to me, it seemed rather bizarre to me that this wasn't done in the first place..