From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753789AbZBOIK5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:10:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751497AbZBOIKs (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:10:48 -0500 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:50802 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751445AbZBOIKr (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:10:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4997CDDC.1020103@garzik.org> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:10:04 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Finger , Sergei Shtylyov CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Alan Cox , Hugh Dickins , Mikael Pettersson Subject: Re: [Bug #12609] v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression References: <499797FD.5070701@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: <499797FD.5070701@lwfinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Larry Finger wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of recent regressions. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know >> (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12609 >> Subject : v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression >> Submitter : Larry Finger >> Date : 2009-01-23 23:52 (23 days old) >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123275478111406&w=4 >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123254501314058&w=4 >> Handled-By : Mikael Pettersson >> Hugh Dickins >> Sergei Shtylyov >> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123412278730735&w=4 > > This problem is not fixed as of 2.6.29-rc5. Sergei, what is the latest version of your patch? According to my notes, you and Hugh were going back and forth trading patches, and I never saw a final version... Jeff