From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754112AbZBOMGK (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:06:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752782AbZBOMF5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:05:57 -0500 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:31667 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752540AbZBOMF4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 07:05:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4998051B.4030904@ru.mvista.com> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:05:47 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Larry Finger , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Alan Cox , Hugh Dickins , Mikael Pettersson Subject: Re: [Bug #12609] v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression References: <499797FD.5070701@lwfinger.net> <4997CDDC.1020103@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <4997CDDC.1020103@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >>> of recent regressions. >>> >>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >>> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me >>> know >>> (either way). >>> >>> >>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12609 >>> Subject : v2.6.29-rc2 libata sff 32bit PIO regression >>> Submitter : Larry Finger >>> Date : 2009-01-23 23:52 (23 days old) >>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123275478111406&w=4 >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123254501314058&w=4 >>> Handled-By : Mikael Pettersson >>> Hugh Dickins >>> Sergei Shtylyov >>> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123412278730735&w=4 >> >> This problem is not fixed as of 2.6.29-rc5. > > Sergei, what is the latest version of your patch? According to my > notes, you and Hugh were going back and forth trading patches, and I > never saw a final version... I've been excessively busy again. Will post today. > Jeff WBR, Sergei