public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: etienne <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:01:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <499B178B.9090601@numericable.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.3IBoeBnwT1eZcqeO6DAE1tHBYc4@ifi.uio.no>

hello,


i was playing with smack, trying to do funny things
Alas, when I use a 'labelled process' and try to access internet, packet are dropped sooner or later (because of ip options)

I tried to 
echo 0.0.0.0/0 @ > /smack/netlabel 
with no success...


looking at security/smack/smack_lsm.c:smack_host_label
the following lines

bestmask.s_addr = 0;
...
if ((miap->s_addr | bestmask.s_addr) == bestmask.s_addr)
   continue;

if the dest we try to reach match the 0.0.0.0/0, this condition will be true (either because we have a better match or because, well (miap->s_addr | bestmask.s_addr) == bestmask.s_addr == 0

So let the 0.0.0.0/0 a chance!

I realize this patch is a little ugly, a cleaner way would be to insert  struct smk_netlbladdr sorted from longest to smallest mask and break the loop as soon as we have a match...
regards,
Etienne 



Signed-off-by: Etienne <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
------
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 0278bc0..9d2576d 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -1540,7 +1540,7 @@ static char *smack_host_label(struct sockaddr_in *sip)
                 * If the list entry mask is less specific than the best
                 * already found this entry is uninteresting.
                 */
-               if ((miap->s_addr | bestmask.s_addr) == bestmask.s_addr)
+               if ( ((miap->s_addr | bestmask.s_addr) == bestmask.s_addr) &&  (miap->s_addr | bestmask.s_addr) != 0  )
                        continue;
                /*
                 * This is better than any entry found so far.

       reply	other threads:[~2009-02-17 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.O38YY4pVfLlMFJNBI3mhgn+qOcQ@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.c87eBVWyCqqi9h1c54QlwKDAIbg@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.f7jv/+EnhNJziduAqQS3XHiU6/A@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.1A5YyyPb1uCn//vnk7baNJGI0IM@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]       ` <fa.HFpMNTzIQ1+pODZB3+XkfnipCfo@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]         ` <fa.3IBoeBnwT1eZcqeO6DAE1tHBYc4@ifi.uio.no>
2009-02-17 20:01           ` etienne [this message]
2009-02-17 20:32             ` [PATCH] SMACK smacklabel : apply &MASK to IP inserted in /smack/netlabel etienne
2009-02-17 23:54               ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18  6:01                 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-18  7:25                 ` etienne
2009-02-17 22:39             ` [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match David Miller
2009-02-17 23:52             ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18  7:23               ` etienne
2009-02-18 15:05                 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18 17:09                   ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-18 19:35                     ` etienne
2009-02-18 20:55                       ` Paul Moore
2009-02-20  4:36                       ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-20 18:26                         ` etienne
2009-02-18 18:29                   ` etienne
2009-02-18 19:06                     ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-18 21:16                       ` [PATCH] SMACK netlabel fixes etienne
2009-02-19  5:50                         ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-19 15:24                         ` Paul Moore
2009-02-19 23:22                           ` [PATCH] SMACK netlabel fixes v2 etienne
2009-02-20 16:11                             ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18 19:18                     ` [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=499B178B.9090601@numericable.fr \
    --to=etienne.basset@numericable.fr \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox