From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756241AbZBRBbs (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:31:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757267AbZBRBbO (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:31:14 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57896 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755794AbZBRBbN (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:31:13 -0500 Message-ID: <499B64DC.2060600@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:31:08 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=2EA=2E_Magall=F3n=22?= CC: Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: Intel driver vs MTRRs conflict References: <20090218002046.55c17814@werewolf.home> In-Reply-To: <20090218002046.55c17814@werewolf.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org J.A. Magallón wrote: > > As I said, everything works. And even fast for the kind of machine, it's an > Aspire One and gears gives 740 fps, and video playback is pretty smooth. > But perhaps it would be faster if X could get that mtrr it claims ? > Which CPU? -hpa