From: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc_core: fix data timeout for SEND_EXT_CSD
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:33:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <499D0B5C.4000005@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090218211627.7c16339a@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
ext Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:49:59 +0200
> Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> Commit 0d3e0460f307e84904968aad6cff97bd688583d8
>> "MMC: CSD and CID timeout values" inadvertently broke
>> the timeout for the MMC command SEND_EXT_CSD.
>>
>> This patch puts it back again.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
>> index 9c50e6f..418a270 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
>> @@ -248,12 +248,16 @@ mmc_send_cxd_data(struct mmc_card *card, struct mmc_host *host,
>>
>> sg_init_one(&sg, data_buf, len);
>>
>> - /*
>> - * The spec states that CSR and CID accesses have a timeout
>> - * of 64 clock cycles.
>> - */
>> - data.timeout_ns = 0;
>> - data.timeout_clks = 64;
>> + if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host) && opcode == MMC_SEND_EXT_CSD)
>> + mmc_set_data_timeout(&data, card);
>> + else {
>> + /*
>> + * The spec states that CSR and CID accesses have a timeout
>> + * of 64 clock cycles (8 for SPI).
>> + */
>> + data.timeout_ns = 0;
>> + data.timeout_clks = 64;
>> + }
>>
>> mmc_wait_for_req(host, &mrq);
>>
>
> I'm confused. Where did the 64 come from in the first place? That
> function will not be called for CID/CSD when !SPI. So the way I see it
> the code should be:
>
> if ((opcode == MMC_SEND_CSD) || (opcode == (MMC_SEND_CID)) {
> data.timeout_ns = 0;
> data.timeout_clks = 8;
> } else {
> mmc_set_data_timeout(&data, card);
> }
Theoretically yes, it should be 8 not 64 - if all the SPI devices obey
the standard. As I do not have an SPI device I did not feel comfortable
changing it. Also 64 clocks is not a long time anyway, so it did not
seem to do any harm.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-19 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 15:40 [PATCH] mmc_core: fix data timeout for SEND_EXT_CSD Adrian Hunter
2009-02-11 13:30 ` Matt Fleming
2009-02-11 13:56 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-02-11 14:49 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-02-15 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-18 20:16 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-02-19 7:33 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2009-02-19 11:22 ` Matt Fleming
2009-02-19 12:12 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-03-02 19:55 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-03-03 11:48 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-03-08 13:46 ` Pierre Ossman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=499D0B5C.4000005@nokia.com \
--to=ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox