From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756907AbZBTRJ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:09:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753532AbZBTRJR (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:09:17 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.121]:39051 "EHLO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753384AbZBTRJQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:09:16 -0500 Message-ID: <499EE3BA.7070105@cfl.rr.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:09:14 -0500 From: Mark Hounschell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Herrmann CC: Borislav Petkov , Mark Hounschell , john stultz , linux-kernel , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Can't boot a (HZ = 1000) kernel using an AMD Phenom-II processor References: <499C0913.9050905@compro.net> <20090218141843.GB13304@aftab> <499C3DED.1090807@cfl.rr.com> <20090218174243.GD13304@aftab> <499C7AC8.4080609@cfl.rr.com> <499D364C.3010704@cfl.rr.com> <20090219141131.GM4301@alberich.amd.com> <20090220115357.GE4834@alberich.amd.com> <499ECF87.2070204@cfl.rr.com> <20090220160843.GF4834@alberich.amd.com> <20090220163844.GG4834@alberich.amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20090220163844.GG4834@alberich.amd.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andreas Herrmann wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:08:43PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:43:03AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote: >>> Linux version 2.6.28.3-250Hz (root@harley) (gcc version 4.3.1 >>> 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 135036] (SUSE Linux) >>> ) #7 SMP PREEMPT Fri Feb 2 0 09:01:54 EST 2009 >> Here I doubt that's the right kernel -- at least it was not built today. >> Can you please double check this. > > Oops, your kernel was built today. > Have overlooked it as there was a newline between "2" and "0". > Sorry for the noise. > > But still wondering where's the debug output. I've applied the patch > both to .29-rc5 and with some fuzziness to .28.4 and on my system the > output is visible (e.g. with dmesg). Ah, ... of course you need to use > "debug" kernel parameter as well. Otherwise the KERN_DEBUG messages > are not shown on the serial console. > > Please, can you retry using "hpet=debug debug apic=debug". > Thanks. > > > Andreas > > > Ah yes, ok.... It will be forthcoming. Mark